Sunday, 16 August 2015

MISSILE CONFIGURATION


Posted by at No comments:

ISRO to launch 9 satellites for US

                          Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) will be launching nine nano/ micro satellites for United States during 2015-16 time frame. This will be the first time that ISRO will launch a US satellite.
     
"As on date, Antrix Corporation Ltd, the commercial arm of ISRO, has signed an agreement to launch about nine nano/micro (US) satellites during the 2015-2016 time frame,"
                         These satellites will go as piggyback on PSLV's (Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle), officials said.So far, 45 satellites belonging to international customers from 19 countries have been launched successfully by ISRO's satellite launch vehicles.
                       The first Reusable Launch Vehicle-Technology  Demonstration (RLV-TD) would be held during the end of this year.
       "The first RLV technology demonstration will be held in the end of 2015". 
RLV-TD is a series of technology demonstration missions that have been considered as a first step towards realising a Two Stage To Orbit (TSTO) fully re-usable vehicle.
                       The fully indigenous developed Geo-synchronous Satellite Launch Vehicle (GSLV) D6 would be launched by end of this month, adding the cost of the 2.5 tonne vehicle would be around Rs 250 crore.
The launch of GSAT 6 is expected to give a huge impetus in the field of the communication sector in the country.
Posted by at No comments:

RS 25 - FERRARI OF ROCKET ENGINES



NASA has once again tested an engine that is known as the Ferrari of rocket engines. This RS-25 rocket is very complex and NASA had burned few before learning how to get them started. NASA has called it one of the most complex and efficient rocket engines in the world.


                                   Making of this super powerful engine is a part of NASA’s plans to take the humanity to Mars. This is the overall sixth of the seven tests and NASA is looking for collecting information about the Ferrari of rocket engine’s controllers. These total seven tests are designed to put the upgraded space shuttles through the rigorous pressure and temperature conditions.
This RS-25 engine, aboard the SLS rocket, is the beast that will take us to the Mars one day. At the time of final launch to the Mars, SLS will take four RS-25 engines together, making it the most powerful rocket ever sent into the space.


                                   The initial version of SLS stands 321 feet (98 meters) tall and is capable of taking 77 tons (70,000 kilograms) weight to the low Earth orbit. Apart from this, NASA will also make an evolved version 384 foot tall (117m) with 143 tons (130,000) capacity.
Posted by at No comments:

RS 25 rocket engine test



During the test, the RS-25 burned for 535 seconds during the test.
During the test, it surely looks incredible- but NASA will be performing
more tests to analyze the data and prepare itself for the final launch.
Posted by at No comments:

Wednesday, 25 March 2015

High Altitude Long Endurance Supersonic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle



                               




Mr.Vignesh S,
Aeronautical Engineering Student of Sri Ramakrishna Engineering College has developed a Supersonic Unmanned Aerial Vehicle known as " FLASH Z-27 ". Which has the capability of attaining supersonic flight for combat operation.

Posted by at No comments:

Unmanned aerial vehicle

 An unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), commonly known as a drone and also referred to as an unpiloted aerial vehicle and a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA) by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), is an aircraft without a human pilot aboard. ICAO classify unmanned aircraft into two types under Circular 328 AN/190:[1]
  • Autonomous aircraft – currently considered unsuitable for regulation due to legal and liability issues
  • Remotely piloted aircraft – subject to civil regulation under ICAO and under the relevant national aviation authority
The typical launch and recovery method of an unmanned aircraft is by the function of an automatic system or an external operator on the ground.[2] Historically, UAVs were simple remotely piloted aircraft, but autonomous control is increasingly being employed.[3][not in citation given]. The Nazi-German V-1 flying bomb flew autonomously powered by a pulsejet.
They are usually deployed for military and special operation applications, but also used in a growing number of civil applications,[4] such as policing and firefighting, and nonmilitary security work, such as inspection of power or pipelines. UAVs are often preferred for missions that are too "dull, dirty or dangerous"[5] for manned aircraft.

Definition and terminology[edit]

To distinguish UAVs from missiles, a UAV is defined as a "powered, aerial vehicle that does not carry a human operator, uses aerodynamic forces to provide vehicle lift, can fly autonomously or be piloted remotely, can be expendable or recoverable, and can carry a lethal or nonlethal payload".[6] Therefore, cruise missiles are not considered UAVs because, like many other guided missiles, the vehicle itself is a weapon that is not reused, even though it is also unmanned and in some cases remotely guided.
There are many different names for these aircraft. They are UAV (unpiloted aerial vehicle), RPAS (remote piloted aircraft systems) and model aircraft. It has also become popular to refer to them as drones. Their flight is controlled either autonomously by onboard computers or by the remote control of a pilot on the ground or in another vehicle.
The term unmanned aircraft system (UAS) emphasizes the importance of other elements beyond an aircraft itself. The term UAS was since adopted by the United States Department of Defense (DOD) and the British Civil Aviation Authority (CAA). The term used previously for unmanned aircraft system was unmanned-aircraft vehicle system (UAVS).
The term UAS was first officially used by the FAA in early 2005 and subsequently adopted by DoD that same year in their Unmanned Aircraft System Roadmap 2005–2030.[7]The official acronym UAS is also used by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other government aviation regulatory organizations.

History[edit]

Main article: History of unmanned aerial vehicles
Ryan Firebee was a series of target drones/unpiloted aerial vehicles.
In the mid-1800s Austria sent unmanned, bomb-filled balloons to attack Venice. The drone seen today started innovation in the early 1900s and was originally used for target practice to train military personnel. It continued to be developed during World War I, when theDayton-Wright Airplane Company came up with a pilotless aerial torpedo that would drop and explode at a preset time.[8] The earliest attempt at a powered unmanned aerial vehicle was A. M. Low's "Aerial Target" of 1916.[9] Nikola Tesla described a fleet of unmanned aerial combat vehicles in 1915.[10] A number of remote-controlled airplane advances followed during and after World War I, including theHewitt-Sperry Automatic Airplane. The first scale RPV (Remote Piloted Vehicle) was developed by the film star and model airplaneenthusiast Reginald Denny in 1935.[9] More were made in the technology rush during World War II; these were used both to train antiaircraft gunners and to fly attack missions. Nazi Germany produced and used various UAV aircraft during the course of WWII. Jet engines were applied after World War II in such types as the Australian GAF Jindivik, and Teledyne Ryan Firebee I of 1951, while companies like Beechcraft also got in the game with their Model 1001 for the U.S. Navy in 1955.[9] Nevertheless, they were little more than remote-controlled airplanes until the Vietnam Era.
In 1959 the U.S. Air Force, concerned about losing pilots over hostile territory, began planning for the use of unmanned aircraft.[11] Planning was intensified after a U-2 was shot down over the Soviet Union in 1960. Within days, the highly classified UAV program was launched under the code name of "Red Wagon".[12] The August 1964 clash in the Tonkin Gulf between naval units of the U.S. and North Vietnamese Navy initiated America's highly classified UAVs (Ryan Model 147, Ryan AQM-91 Firefly, Lockheed D-21) into their first combat missions of the Vietnam War.[13] When the "Red Chinese"[14] showed photographs of downed U.S. UAVs via Wide World Photos,[15] the official U.S. response was "no comment."
The Israeli Tadiran Mastiff, which first flew in 1973, is seen as the first modern battlefield UAV, due to its data-link system, endurance-loitering, and live video streaming.[16]
In 1973 the U.S. military officially confirmed that they had been using UAVs in Southeast Asia (Vietnam).[17] Over 5,000 U.S. airmen had been killed and over 1,000 more were missing or captured. The USAF 100th Strategic Reconnaissance Wing had flown approximately 3,435 UAV missions during the war[18] at a cost of about 554 UAVs lost to all causes. In the words of USAF General George S. Brown, Commander, Air Force Systems Command, in 1972, "The only reason we need (UAVs) is that we don't want to needlessly expend the man in the cockpit."[19] Later that same year, General John C. Meyer, Commander in Chief, Strategic Air Command, stated, "we let the drone do the high-risk flying ... the loss rate is high, but we are willing to risk more of them ... they save lives!"[19]
During the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Soviet-supplied surface-to-air missile batteries in Egypt and Syria caused heavy damage to Israelifighter jets. As a result, Israel developed the first UAV with real-time surveillance.[20][21][22] The images and radar decoying provided by these UAVs helped Israel to completely neutralize the Syrian air defenses at the start of the 1982 Lebanon War, resulting in no pilots downed.[23] The first time UAVs were used as proof-of-concept of super-agility post-stall controlled flight in combat flight simulations was with tailless, stealth technology-based, three-dimensional thrust vectoring flight control, jet steering UAVs in Israel in 1987.[24]
With the maturing and miniaturization of applicable technologies as seen in the 1980s and 1990s, interest in UAVs grew within the higher echelons of the U.S. military. In the 1990s, the U.S. Department of Defense gave a contract to AAI Corporation along with Israeli company Mazlat. The U.S. Navy bought the AAI Pioneer UAV that was jointly developed by AAI and Mazlat. Many of these Pioneer and newly developed U.S. UAVs were used in the 1991 Gulf War. UAVs were seen to offer the possibility of cheaper, more capable fighting machines that could be used without risk to aircrews. Initial generations were primarily surveillance aircraft, but some were armed, such as the General Atomics MQ-1 Predator, which used AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-ground missiles.
As of 2012, the United States Air Force employed 7,494 UAVs - almost 1 in 3 USAF aircraft.[25][26] As of 2012, the United States Air Force employed 7,494 UAVs - almost 1 in 3 USAF aircraft.[27][26] The CIA has also operated UAVs.[28]
In 2013 it was reported that UAVs were used by at least 50 countries, several of which made their own: for example, Iran, Israel and China.[29]

Regulation[edit]

Main article: Regulation of unmanned aerial vehicles
To operate a UAV for non-recreational purposes in the United States, according to the Federal Aviation Administration users must obtain a Certificate of Authorization.[30] The usage of UAVs for law-enforcement purposes is also regulated at a state level.
The Irish Aviation Authority policy is that unmanned aerial systems may not be flown without the operator receiving a specific permission from the IAA.[31]
In April 2014, the South African Civil Aviation Authority announced that it would clamp down on the illegal flying of UAVs in South African airspace.[32]

Unmanned aircraft system[edit]

An unmanned aircraft system (UAS) includes ground stations and other elements besides the actual aircraft. A typical UAS consists of the following:
  • unmanned aircraft (UA);
  • control system, such as ground control station (GCS);
  • control link, a specialized datalink; and
  • other related support equipment.

Classification[edit]

Although most UAVs are fixed-wing aircraft, rotorcraft designs (i.e., RUAVs) such as this MQ-8B Fire Scout are also used.
UAVs typically fall into one of six functional categories (although multi-role airframe platforms are becoming more prevalent):
  • Target and decoy – providing ground and aerial gunnery a target that simulates an enemy aircraft or missile
  • Reconnaissance – providing battlefield intelligence
  • Combat – providing attack capability for high-risk missions (see Unmanned combat air vehicle)
  • Logistics – UAVs specifically designed for cargo and logistics operation
  • Research and development – used to further develop UAV technologies to be integrated into field deployed UAV aircraft
  • Civil and Commercial UAVs – UAVs specifically designed for civil and commercial applications
Schiebel S-100 fitted with a Lightweight Multirole Missile
They can also be categorised in terms of range/altitude and the following has been advanced as relevant at such industry events asParcAberporth Unmanned Systems forum:
  • Hand-held 2,000 ft (600 m) altitude, about 2 km range
  • Close 5,000 ft (1,500 m) altitude, up to 10 km range
  • NATO type 10,000 ft (3,000 m) altitude, up to 50 km range
  • Tactical 18,000 ft (5,500 m) altitude, about 160 km range
  • MALE (medium altitude, long endurance) up to 30,000 ft (9,000 m) and range over 200 km
  • HALE (high altitude, long endurance) over 30,000 ft (9,100 m) and indefinite range
  • HYPERSONIC high-speed, supersonic (Mach 1–5) or hypersonic (Mach 5+) 50,000 ft (15,200 m) or suborbital altitude, range over 200 km
  • ORBITAL low earth orbit (Mach 25+)
  • CIS Lunar Earth-Moon transfer
  • CACGS Computer Assisted Carrier Guidance System for UAVs
U.S. UAV demonstrators in 2005
The U.S. Military UAV tier system is used by military planners to designate the various individual aircraft elements in an overall usage plan. The Tiers do not refer to specific models of aircraft but rather roles.

Uses[edit]

In 2013, the DHL parcel service tested a "microdrones md4-1000" for delivery of medicine.
Civil Drone FOX-C8-HD AltiGator
IAI Heron, an unmanned aerial vehicle developed by the Malat (UAV) division of Israel Aerospace Industries
A Hydra Technologies Ehécatltaking-off for a surveillance mission
Beyond the military applications of UAVs with which "drones" became most associated, numerous civil aviation uses have been developed, including aerial surveying of crops,[33] acrobatic aerial footage in filmmaking,[33] search and rescue operations,[33] inspecting power lines and pipelines,[34] counting wildlife,[34] delivering medical supplies to remote or otherwise inaccessible regions,[35] with some manufacturers rebranding the technology as "unmanned aerial systems" (UASs) in preference over the military-connotative term "drones."[33] Further uses include reconnaissance operations,[36] border patrol missions,[36][37] forest fire detection,[36] surveillance,[36]coordinating humanitarian aid,[38] search & rescue missions,[36] detection of illegal hunting,[39] land surveying,[40] fire and large-accident investigation,[40] landslide measurement,[40] illegal landfill detection,[40] and crowd monitoring.[40]

Commercial aerial surveillance[edit]

Aerial surveillance of large areas is made possible with low cost UAV systems. Surveillance applications include livestock monitoring, wildfire mapping, pipeline security, home security, road patrol, and anti-piracy. The trend for the use of UAV technology in commercial aerial surveillance is expanding rapidly with increased development of automated object detection approaches.[41]

Commercial and motion picture filmmaking[edit]

In the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations generally permit hobbyist drone use when they are flown below 400 feet, and within the UAV operator’s line of sight. For commercial drone camerawork inside the United States, industry sources state that usage is largely at the de facto consent – or benign neglect – of local law enforcement. Use of UAVs for filmmaking is generally easier on large private lots or in rural and exurban areas with fewer space concerns. In certain localities such as Los Angeles and New York, authorities have actively interceded to shut down drone filmmaking efforts due to concerns driven by safety or terrorism.[42][43][44]
In June 2014, the FAA said it had received a petition from the Motion Picture Association of America seeking approval for the use of drones in video and filmmaking. Seven companies behind the petition argued that low-cost drones could be used for shots that would otherwise require a helicopter or a manned aircraft, which would reduce costs.[citation needed] Drones are already used by movie makers and media in other parts of the world.
Drones were used in the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi for filming skiing and snowboarding events. Some advantages of using unmanned aerial vehicles in sports are that they allow video to get closer to the athletes, they are more flexible than cable-suspended camera systems.[45]

Journalism[edit]

Many journalists are interested in using drones for newsgathering. The College of Journalism and Mass Communications at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln has established the Drone Journalism Lab. The University of Missouri also has created the Missouri Drone Journalism Program. The Professional Society of Drone Journalists was established in 2011 and describes itself as "the first international organization dedicated to establishing the ethical, educational and technological framework for the emerging field of drone journalism."[46] Drones have been especially useful in covering disasters such as typhoons.[47] A coalition of 11 news organizations is working with the Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership at Virginia Tech on how reporters could use unmanned aircraft to gather news.[48] 

Law enforcement[edit]

Main article: Use of UAVs in law enforcement
Many police departments in India have procured drones for law and order and aerial surveillance.[49][50][51][52]
UAVs have been used for domestic police work in Canada and the United States;[42][43] a dozen US police forces had applied for UAV permits by March 2013.[29] In 2013 the Seattle Police Department’s plan to deploy UAVs was scrapped after protests.[53] UAVs have been used by U.S. Customs and Border Protection since 2005.[54] with plans to use armed drones.[55] The FBI stated in 2013 that they own and use UAVs for the purposes of "surveillance".[56]
In 2014 it was reported that five English police forces had obtained or operated unmanned aerial vehicles for observation.[57] Merseyside Police caught a car thief with a UAV in 2010, but the UAV was later lost during a training exercise[58] and the police stated the UAV would not be replaced due to operational limitations and the cost of staff training.[58]
A UAV in Goma as part ofMONUSCO peacekeeping mission
In August 2013, the Italian defence company Selex ES provided an unarmed surveillance drone to be deployed in the Democratic Republic of Congo to monitor movements of armed groups in the region and to protect the civilian population more effectively.[59]

Search and rescue[edit]

Aeryon Scout in flight
UAVs were used in search and rescue after hurricanes struck Louisiana and Texas in 2008. Predators, operating between 18,000–29,000 feet above sea level, performed search and rescue and damage assessment. Payloads carried were an optical sensor and a synthetic aperture radar. The latter can provide images through clouds, rain or fog, and in daytime or nighttime conditions, all in real-time. Photos taken before and after the storm are compared, and a computer highlights areas of damage.[60][61] Micro UAVs, such as the Aeryon Scout, have been used to perform search and rescue activities on a smaller scale, such as the search for missing persons.[62]
UAVs have been tested as airborne lifeguards, locating distressed swimmers using thermal cameras and dropping life preservers to swimmers.[63][64]

Scientific research[edit]

AAI Corporation Aerosonde
See also: Research balloon
Unmanned aircraft are especially useful in penetrating areas that may be too dangerous for manned aircraft. The U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) began utilizing the Aerosonde unmanned aircraft system in 2006 as a hurricane hunter. The 35-pound system can fly into a hurricane and communicate near-real-time data directly to the National Hurricane Center. Beyond the standard barometric pressure and temperature data typically culled from manned hurricane hunters, the Aerosonde system provides measurements from closer to the water’s surface than previously captured. NASA later began using the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk for extended hurricane measurements.

Reconnaissance[edit]

See also: Battlefield UAV and reconnaissance aircraft
Hermes 450 reconnaissance UAV of the Brazilian Air Force
The Tu-141 "Swift" reusable Soviet operational and tactical reconnaissance drone is intended for reconnaissance to a depth of several hundred kilometers from the front line at supersonic speeds.[65] The Tu-123 "Hawk" is a supersonic long-range reconnaissance drone (UAV) intended for conducting photographic and signals intelligence to a distance of 3200 km; it was produced since 1964.[66] The La-17P (UAV) is a reconnaissance UAV produced since 1963.[67] Since 1945, the Soviet Union also produced "doodlebug".[68] There are 43 known Soviet UAV models.[69]
In 2013, the U.S. Navy launched a UAV from a submerged submarine, the first step to “providing mission intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities to the U.S. Navy’s submarine force.”[70]

Armed attacks[edit]

See also: Targeted killing, Unmanned combat aerial vehicle and Drone attacks in Pakistan
Predator launching a Hellfire missile
MQ-1 Predator UAVs armed with Hellfire missiles have been used by the U.S. as platforms for hitting ground targets. Armed Predators were first used in late 2001 from bases in Pakistan and Uzbekistan, mostly aimed at assassinating high profile individuals (terrorist leaders, etc.) inside Afghanistan. Since then, there have been many reported cases of such attacks taking place in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Somalia.[71] The advantage of using an unmanned vehicle rather than a manned aircraft in such cases is to avoid a diplomatic embarrassment should the aircraft be shot down and the pilots captured, since the bombings take place in countries deemed friendly and without the official permission of those countries.[72][73][74][75]

Defense against UAVs[edit]

The United States armed forces currently have no defense against low level drone attack, but the Joint Integrated Air and Missile Defense Organization is working to repurpose existing systems to defend American forces.[76]

Civilian casualties[edit]

See also: Civilian casualties from US drone strikes
In March 2009, The Guardian reported allegations that Israeli UAVs armed with missiles killed 48 Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip, including two small children in a field and a group of women and girls in an otherwise empty street.[77] In June, Human Rights Watchinvestigated six UAV attacks that were reported to have resulted in civilian casualties and alleged that Israeli forces either failed to take all feasible precautions to verify that the targets were combatants or failed to distinguish between combatants and civilians.[78][79][80]
In 2009 Brookings Institution reported that in the United States-led drone attacks in Pakistan, ten civilians died for every militant killed.[81][82] A former ambassador of Pakistan said that American UAV attacks were turning Pakistani opinion against the United States.[83] The website PakistanBodyCount.Org shows 1,065 civilian deaths between 2004 and 2010.[84] According to a 2010 analysis by the New America Foundation 114 UAV-based missile strikes in northwest Pakistan from 2004 killed between 830 and 1,210 individuals, around 550 to 850 of whom were militants.[85] In October 2013 the Pakistani government revealed that since 2008 there had been 317 drone strikes that killed 2,160 Islamic militants and 67 civilians - far less than previous government and independent organization calculations.[86]

Targets for military training[edit]

Main article: Target drone
Since 1997, the U.S. military has used more than 80 F-4 Phantoms converted into robotic planes for use as aerial targets for combat training of human pilots.[87] The F-4s were supplemented in September 2013 with F-16s as more realistically maneuverable targets.[87]

Conservation[edit]

ShadowView Eco Ranger
By 2012 the International Anti-Poaching Foundation was using UAVs.[88]
In June 2012, WWF announced it will begin using UAVs in Nepal to aid conservation efforts following a successful trial of two aircraft inChitwan National Park, with ambitions to expand to other countries, such as Tanzania and Malaysia. The global wildlife organization plans to train ten personnel to use the UAVs, with operational use beginning in the fall.[89][90] In August 2012, UAVs were used by members of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society in Namibia to document the annual seal cull.[91] In December 2013, the Falcon UAV was selected by the Namibian Govt and WWF to help combat rhino poaching.[92] The drones will be monitoring rhino populations in Etosha National Park and will use RFID sensors.[93]
In 2012, the World Wildlife Fund supplied two FPV Raptor 1.6 UAVs[94] to the Nepal National Parks. These UAVs were used to monitor rhinos tigers and elephants and deter poachers.[95] The UAVs were equipped with time lapse cameras and could fly for 18 miles at 650 feet.[96]
In December 2012, the Kruger National Park started using a Seeker II UAV against rhino poachers. The UAV was loaned to the South African National Parks authority by its manufacturer, Denel Dynamics of South Africa.[97][98]

Animal rights[edit]

Anti-whaling activists used an Osprey UAV (made by Kansas-based Hangar 18) in 2012 to monitor Japanese whaling ships in the Antarctic.[99]
In 2012, the Ulster Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals used a quadcopter UAV to deter badger baiters in Northern Ireland.[100] In March 2013, the British League Against Cruel Sports announced they had carried out trial flights with UAVs and planned to use a fixed-wing OpenRanger and an "Octocopter" to gather evidence to make private prosecutions against illegal hunting of foxes and other animals.[97] The UAVs were supplied by ShadowView. A spokesman for Privacy International said that "licencing and permission for drones is only on the basis of health and safety, without considering whether privacy rights are violated."[97] The CAA rules are that UAV aircraft less than 20 kilograms in weight must be in direct visual contact with the pilot, cannot fly within 150 meters of a congested area or within 50 meters of a person or vehicle, and cannot be used for commercial activity.[101][97]
In Pennsylvania, Showing Animals Respect and Kindness (SHARK) used drones to monitor people shooting at pigeons for sport.[102] One of their Octocopter drones was shot down by hunters.[103]
In March 2013, the Times published a controversial story that UAV conservation nonprofit ShadowView, founded by former members of Sea Shepherd Conservation Society, had been working for several months with anti-hunting charity The League Against Cruel Sports to expose illegal fox hunting in the UK.[104] Hunt supporters have argued that using UAVs to film hunting is an invasion of privacy.[105]
In April 2013, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals announced its intention to use drones to monitor hunters, as well as possibly industrial farms, fishing areas, and "other venues where animals routinely suffer and die". Some gun owners responded by suggesting they'd shoot down these drones.[106]
In 2014, Will Potter proposed using drones to monitor conditions on factory farms. The idea is to circumvent ag-gag prohibitions by keeping the drones on public property but equipping them with cameras sensitive enough to monitor activities on the farms.[107] Potter raised nearly $23,000 in 2 days for this project on Kickstarter.[107]

Maritime patrol[edit]

Japan is studying how to deal with the UAVs the PRC is starting to use to enforce their claims on unmanned islands.[108]

Forest fire detection[edit]

See: Forestry unmanned aerial vehicles
Another application of UAVs is the prevention and early detection of forest fires. The possibility of constant flight, both day and night, makes the methods used until now (helicopters, watchtowers, etc.) become obsolete.[citation needed] Cameras and sensors that provide real-time emergency services, including information about the location of the outbreak of fire as well as many factors (wind speed, temperature, humidity, etc.) that are helpful for fire crews to conduct fire suppression.

Surveying[edit]

Oil, gas and mineral exploration and production[edit]

Camclone T21 UAV fitted withCSIRO guidance system used to inspect power lines (2009)
UAVs can be used to perform geophysical surveys, in particular geomagnetic surveys[109] where the processed measurements of the Earth's differential magnetic field strength are used to calculate the nature of the underlying magnetic rock structure. A knowledge of the underlying rock structure helps trained geophysicists to predict the location of mineral deposits. The production side of oil and gas exploration and production entails the monitoring of the integrity of oil and gas pipelines and related installations. For above-ground pipelines, this monitoring activity could be performed using digital cameras mounted on one or more UAVs.[110]

Disaster relief[edit]

Drones can help in disaster relief by gathering information from across an affected area to build a picture of the situation and give recommendations to direct resources.[111]
T-Hawk[112] and Global Hawk[113] drones were used to gather information about the damaged Fukushima Number 1 nuclear plant and disaster-stricken areas of the Tōhoku region after the March 2011 tsunami.

Archaeology[edit]

In Peru archaeologists use drones to speed up survey work and protect sites from squatters, builders and miners. Small drones helped researchers produce three-dimensional models of Peruvian sites instead of the usual flat maps – and in days and weeks instead of months and years.[114]
Drones have replaced expensive and clumsy small planes, kites and helium balloons. Drones costing as little as £650 have proven useful. In 2013 drones flew over at least six Peruvian archaeological sites, including the colonial Andean town Machu Llacta 4,000 metres (13,000 ft) above sea level. The drones continue to have altitude problems in the Andes, leading to plans to make a drone blimp.[114]
An archaeologist said, "You can go up three metres and photograph a room, 300 metres and photograph a site, or you can go up 3,000 metres and photograph the entire valley."[114]
In September 2014 drones weighing about .5 kg were used for 3D mapping of the above-ground ruins of the Greek city of Aphrodisias.[115]

Cargo transport[edit]

Main article: Delivery drone
The RQ-7 Shadow can deliver a "Quick-MEDS" canister to front-line troops.
UAVs can transport medicines and vaccines, and retrieve medical samples, into and out of remote or otherwise inaccessible regions.[35]"Ambulance drones" rapidly deliver defibrillators in the crucial few minutes after cardiac arrests, and include livestream communication capability allowing paramedics to remotely observe and instruct on-scene individuals in how to use the defibrillators.[116]
Initial attempts at commercial use of UAVs, such as the Tacocopter company for food delivery were blocked by FAA regulation.[117]Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos' December 2013 announcement that Amazon was planning rapid delivery of lightweight commercial products using UAVs was met with skepticism.[118]
In 2013, in a research project of DHL, a sub-kilogram quantity of medicine was delivered via a prototype Microdrones “parcelcopter”.[119][120]
In 2014, the prime minister of the United Arab Emirates announced that the UAE planned to launch a fleet of UAVs[121] to deliver official documents and supply emergency services at accidents. A prototype UAV was displayed.[122]
Google revealed in 2014 it had been testing UAVs in Australia for two years. The Google X program known as "project wing" aims to produce drones that can deliver not only products sold via e-commerce, but larger delivery items[123]

Crop spraying[edit]

A Yamaha R-MAX, a UAV that has been used for aerial application in Japan
Japanese farmers have been using Yamaha's R-50 and RMAX unmanned helicopters to dust their crops since 1987.[124][125] Some farming initiatives in the U.S. utilize UAVs for crop spraying, as they are often cheaper than a full-sized helicopter.

Future potential[edit]

Krossblade SkyProwler transformer UAV for research into vertical take-off and landing technologies for aircraft
In the military sector, Predators and Reapers are tailor-made for counterterrorism operations and in war zones in which the enemy lacks sufficient firepower to shoot them down, but are not designed to withstand antiaircraft defenses or air-to-air combat; in September 2013 the chief of the Air Combat Command stated that current UAVs were "useless in a contested environment” unless manned aircraft were put there to protect them.[126] A 2012 Congressional Research Service (CRS) report indicated that in the future, UAVs may be able to perform a variety of tasks beyond their present roles in intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance and strikes; the CRS report listed resupply, combat search and rescue, aerial refueling, and air-to-air combat ("a more difficult future task") as possible future undertakings.[127] The U.S. Department of Defense's Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap FY2013-2038 foresees UAVs having a more important place in combat, recognizing that the near future will involve making sure the technology works at all, before exploiting their potential in the following decade.[128] Beyond solving technical issues, issues to be resolved include human-UAV interaction, managing expected increases in amounts of information generated by UAV fleets, transitioning from direct human control to UAVs' automatic adaptation to changing conditions, and developing UAV-specific munitions.[128]
Solar-powered atmospheric satellites ("atmosats") designed for operating at altitudes exceeding 20 km (12 miles, or 60,000 feet) for as long as five years can perform duties more economically and with more versatility than low earth orbit satellites.[129] Likely applications include weather monitoring, disaster recovery, earth imaging, and communications.[129]
The European Union says drone market share could be up to 10% of aviation in 10 years, and the EU suggests streamlining R&Defforts.[130]

Design and development considerations[edit]

UAV design and production is a global activity with manufacturers all across the world. The United States and Israel were initial pioneers in this technology, and U.S. manufacturers had a market share of over 60% in 2006, with U.S. market share due to increase by 5–10% through 2016.[131] Northrop Grumman andGeneral Atomics are the dominant manufacturers in this industry on the strength of the Global Hawk and Predator/Mariner systems.[131] According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Israeli companies were behind 41% of all UAVs exported in 2001-2011.[132] The European market share represented 4% of global revenue in 2006.[131]
In December 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration announced its selections six states that will host test sites emphasizing respective research goals: Alaska (sites with a wide variety of climates), Nevada (formulating standards for air traffic control and UAV operators), New York (integrating UAVs into congested airspace), North Dakota (human impact; use in temperate climates), Texas (safety requirements and airworthiness testing), and Virginia (assessing operational and technical risk).[133]
Some universities offer UAS research and training programs or academic degrees.[34]
On October 12, 2014, the Linux Foundation and leading technology companies launched the open source Dronecode Project. The Dronecode Project goal is to help meet the needs of the growing UAV community with a neutral governance structure and coordination of funding for resources and tools which the community needs.[134]

Degree of autonomy[edit]

UAV monitoring and control at U.S. Customs and Border Protection
HiMAT remote cockpit synthetic vision display (Photo: NASA 1984)
During the Vietnam War UAVs often flew either in a straight line or in preset circles collecting video until they ran out of fuel and landed. Later UAVs often combine remote control and computerized automation. More sophisticated versions may have built-in control or guidance systems to perform low-level human pilot duties, such as speed and flight-path stabilization, and simple scripted navigation functions, such as waypoint following.[135]
The development of air-vehicle autonomy has largely been driven by the military.[136]
Autonomy technology that is important to UAV development falls under the following categories:
  • Sensor fusion: Combining information from different sensors for use on board the vehicle including the automatic interpretation of ground imagery [137][138]
  • Communications: Handling communication and coordination between multiple agents in the presence of incomplete and imperfect information
  • Path planning: Determining an optimal path for vehicle to follow while meeting certain objectives and mission constraints, such as obstacles or fuel requirements
  • Trajectory generation (motion planning): Determining an optimal control maneuver to take in order to follow a given path or to go from one location to another
  • Trajectory regulation: The specific control strategies required to constrain a vehicle within some tolerance to a trajectory
  • Task allocation and scheduling: Determining the optimal distribution of tasks amongst a group of agents within time and equipment constraints
  • Cooperative tactics: Formulating an optimal sequence and spatial distribution of activities between agents in order to maximize the chance of success in any given mission scenario
Autonomy is commonly defined as the ability to make decisions without human intervention. To that end, the goal of autonomy is to teach machines to be "smart" and act more like humans. The keen observer may associate this with the developments in the field of artificial intelligence made popular in the 1980s and 1990s, such as expert systems, neural networks, machine learning, natural language processing, and vision. However, the mode of technological development in the field of autonomy has mostly followed a bottom-up approach, such as hierarchical control systems.[139]
To some extent, the ultimate goal in the development of autonomy technology is to replace the human pilot. It remains to be seen whether future developments of autonomy technology, the perception of the technology, and, most importantly, the political climate surrounding the use of such technology will limit the development and utility of autonomy for UAV applications. Also as a result of this, synthetic vision for piloting has not caught on in the UAV arena as it did with manned aircraft. NASA utilized synthetic vision for test pilots on the HiMAT program in the early 1980s, but the advent of more autonomous UAV autopilots greatly reduced the need for this technology.[citation needed]
Interoperable UAV technologies became essential as systems proved their mettle in military operations, taking on tasks too challenging or dangerous for troops. NATO addressed the need for commonality through STANAG 4586. According to a NATO press release, the agreement began the ratification process in 1992. Its goal was to allow allied nations to easily share information obtained from unmanned aircraft through common ground control station technology.[citation needed]
Military analysts, policy makers, and academics debate the benefits and risks of lethal autonomous robots (LARs), which would be able to select targets and fire without approval of a human. Some contend that LAR drones would be more precise, less likely to kill civilians, and less prone to being hacked.[140] Heather Roff replies that LARs may not be appropriate for complex conflicts, and targeted populations would likely react angrily against them.[140] Will McCants argues that the public would be more outraged by machine failures than human error, making LARs politically implausible.[140] According to Mark Gubrud, claims that drones can be hacked are overblown and misleading, and moreover, drones are more likely to be hacked if they're autonomous, because otherwise the human operator would take control: "Giving weapon systems autonomous capabilities is a good way to lose control of them, either due to a programming error, unanticipated circumstances, malfunction, or hack, and then not be able to regain control short of blowing them up, hopefully before they've blown up too many other things and people."[141]
Autopilot systems for UAVs include:

Endurance[edit]

The endurance of a UAV is not constrained by the physiological limitations of a human pilot. The maximum flight duration of unmanned aerial vehicles varies widely.
UEL UAV-741 Wankel engine for UAV operations
Because of the small size, weight, very low vibration and high power to weight ratio, Wankel rotary engines are increasingly being used in UAV aircraft.[142] The engine is approximately one third of the size and weight of a piston engine of equivalent power output, which offers significant advantages for UAV aircraft.[143] Additionally: the engine rotors cannot seize, since rotor casings expand more than rotors; the engine is not susceptible to shock-cooling during descent; it does not require an enriched mixture for cooling at high power and having no reciprocating parts, there is less vulnerability to damage when the engines revolves higher than the designed maximum running operation. The attributes of the Wankel engine transpire into less fuel usage in UAVs giving greater range or a higher payload.[144]
Solar-electric UAVs hold potential for unlimited flight, a concept originally championed by the AstroFlight Sunrise in 1974.[145][146][147][148]
Electric UAVs kept aloft indefinitely by laser power-beaming[149] technology represent another proposed solution to the endurance challenge.
One of the major problems with UAVs is the lack of inflight aerial refueling capability. In 2012, the US Air Force was promoting research that should end in an inflight UAV refueling capability.[150] A UAV-UAV simulated refuelling flight using two Global Hawks was achieved in 2012.[151]
One of the uses for a high endurance UAV would be to "stare" at the battlefield for a long period of time (ARGUS-IS, Gorgon Stare, Integrated Sensor Is Structure) to produce a record of events that could then be played backwards to track where improvised explosive devices (IEDs) came from.
Notable high endurance flights
UAVFlight timeDateNotes
Boeing Condor58 hours 11 minutes1989The aircraft is currently in the Hiller Aviation Museum.
GNAT-75040 hours1992[153][154]
TAM-538 hours 52 minutes11 August 2003Smallest UAV to cross the Atlantic
AC Propulsion Solar Electric48 hours 11 minutes3 June 2005[156]
Aerosonde38 hours 48 minutes3 May 2006[157]
QinetiQ Zephyr Solar Electric54 hoursSeptember 2007[158][159]
RQ-4 Global Hawk33.1 hours22 March 2008Set an endurance record for a full-scale, operational unmanned aircraft.[160]
QinetiQ Zephyr Solar Electric82 hours 37 minutes28–31 July 2008[161]
QinetiQ Zephyr Solar Electric336 hours 22 minutes9–23 July 2010[162]

Existing UAV systems[edit]

UAVs have been developed and deployed by many countries around the world. For a list of models by country, see: List of unmanned aerial vehicles. The use of unmanned aerial systems, however, is not limited to state powers: non-state actors can also build, buy and operate these combat vehicles.[26]
The export of UAVs or technology capable of carrying a 500 kg payload at least 300 km is restricted in many countries by the Missile Technology Control Regime.
China has exhibited some UAV designs, but its ability to operate them is limited by the lack of high endurance domestic engines, satellite infrastructure, and operational experience.[163]

Historical events involving UAVs[edit]

  • In 1981, the Israeli IAI Scout drone, is operated in combat missions by the South African Defence Force against Angola during Operation Protea.[164]
  • In 1982, UAVs operated by the Israeli Air Force are instrumental during Operation Mole Cricket 19, where both IAI Scout and Tadiran Mastiff are used to identity SAM sites, while Samson decoy UAVs are used to activate and confuse Syrian radar.[164][165]
  • During the Persian Gulf War, Iraqi Army forces surrendered to the UAVs of the USS Wisconsin.[166][167]
  • In October 2002, a few days before the U.S. Senate vote on the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution, about 75 senators were told in closed sessionthat Saddam Hussein had the means of delivering biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction by UAVs that could be launched from ships off the Atlantic coast to attack U.S. eastern seaboard cities. Colin Powell suggested in his presentation to the United Nations that they had been transported out of Iraq and could be launched against the U.S.[168] It was later revealed that Iraq's UAV fleet consisted of only a few outdated Czech training drones.[169] At the time, there was a vigorous dispute within the intelligence community as to whether CIA's conclusions about Iraqi UAVs were accurate. The U.S. Air Force, the agency most familiar with UAVs, denied outright that Iraq possessed any offensive UAV capability.[170]
  • The first US targeted UAV killing outside the conventional battlefield took place on 3 November 2002, in the Marib district of Yemen. Six alleged terrorists were killed in their SUV by a UAV-fired missile.[171] The command centre was in Tampa, Florida, USA.
  • In December 2002, the first ever dogfight involving a UAV occurred when an Iraqi MiG-25 and a U.S. RQ-1 Predator fired missiles at each other. The MiG's missile destroyed the Predator.[172]
  • The U.S. deployed UAVs in Yemen to search for and kill Anwar al-Awlaki,[173] an American and Yemen imam, firing at and failing to kill him at least once[174] before he was killed in a UAV-launched missile attack in Yemen on 30 September 2011. The targeted killing of an American citizen was unprecedented. However, nearly nine years earlier in 2002, U.S. citizen Kemal Darwish was one of six men killed by the first UAV strike outside a war zone, in Yemen.[175]
  • In December 2011, Iran captured a United States' RQ-170 unmanned aerial vehicle that flew over Iran and rejected President Barack Obama's request to return it to the US.[176][177] Iranian officials claim to have recovered data from the U.S. surveillance aircraft. However, it is not clear how Iran brought it down.[178] There have also been claims that Iran spoofed the GPS signal used by the UAV[29] and hijacked it into landing on an Iranian runway.

Aircraft near-miss incidents[edit]

Canada[edit]

In March 2014, a remote-controlled helicopter was reported by the crew of a Boeing 777 flying 30 metres from their craft at Vancouver International Airport.[179]
In April 2014, video taken from a camera on board a UAV showed it flying close to an airliner as it landed at the same airport.[179] A Transport Canada spokesman said his department and the RCMP were investigating.[179]

United Kingdom[edit]

In October 2014 it was reported that a UAV had flown within 25 metres of an ATR 72 passenger airliner on 30 May 2014.[180][181][182] The aircraft was approaching London Southend Airport and about to intercept the ILS glide slope when the copilot reported seeing a small craft flying about 100m to the right of the aircraft.[180][181][182] The copilot and Air Traffic Controller agreed it was probably a quadcopter - it was seen flying as close as 25m to the aircraft.[180][181][182] Southend ATC couldn't detect the craft on radar - subsequent examination of radar from other sites produced several brief but inconclusive radar signals.[182] Police were contacted, but the operator of the UAV could not be found.[180][181][182]

United States[edit]

In March 2013, an Alitalia pilot on final approach to runway 31 right at John F. Kennedy International Airport reported seeing a small UAV near his aircraft.[183][184][185][186] Both the FAA and FBI were reported to be investigating.[183][184][185][186]
On 22 March 2014, US Airways Flight 4650 nearly collided with a drone while landing at Tallahassee Regional Airport. The plane, a Bombardier CRJ200, was at an altitude of 2,300 feet (700 m) when it came dangerously close to the drone, described by one of the pilots "as a camouflaged F-4 fixed-wing aircraft that was quite small". Jim Williams, head of the UAV office at the Federal Aviation Administration, said: "The risk for a small [drone] to be ingested into a passenger airline engine is very real." The Federal Bureau of Investigation was investigating the incident, which was the first known instance of a large airliner nearly colliding with a drone in the U.S.[187]

Domestic aerial surveillance and other incidents[edit]

Although UAVs are today most commonly associated with military actions, UAVs are increasingly used by civilian government agencies, businesses, and private individuals. In the United States, for example, government agencies use UAVs such as the RQ-9 Reaper to patrol the nation's borders, scout property, and locate fugitives.[188] One of the first authorized for domestic usage was the ShadowHawk UAV in service in Montgomery County, Texas, and is being used by their SWAT and emergency management offices.[189]

Australia[edit]

Sydney Harbour Bridge collision[edit]

In October 2013, a UAV collided with Sydney Harbour Bridge.[190] The craft was found near the bridge on a rail line.[190][191] The Civil Aviation Safety Authority started an investigation.[190] A CASA spokesman said that those operating remotely piloted aircraft should keep them at least 30m away from structures, buildings and people, to check with the local council where they could be used and that the airspace around the bridge was restricted for all aircraft, including small ones.[190] The craft's owner, who had lost control of it, contacted the police.[191] The New South Wales police stated that the matter had been investigated and deemed not suspicious.[191] The police returned the craft to its owner.[191]

Endure Batavia Triathlon incident[edit]

In April 2014, triathlete Raija Ogden was injured in an incident in Geraldton, Western Australia involving a drone that had been hovering above competitors filming the event.[192]She claimed that she was injured when the drone collided with her during the race.[192] Warren Abrahams, the owner of the UAV, denied that it had collided with her and claimed that she had been injured when she was frightened by the falling UAV and tripped.[192] Ogden disputed these claims saying that "I have lacerations on my head from the drone and the ambulance crew took a piece of propeller from my head".[192]
Abrahams claimed that video footage of the event supported his claims.[192] Timing equipment caused interference with the operation of the UAV while it was close to people on the ground.[193] Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) regulations require that UAVs be at least 30m from people and shouldn't be operated in a way that creates a hazard.[193]
In July 2014, CASA referred the operators of the UAV to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions.[193] The CDPP later decided not to proceed with a charge of reckless operation against Abrahams. However CASA said its lawyers would consider whether to fine him.[194]

Brazil[edit]

Didier Deschamps claimed that a UAV flew over the French teams training camp in Ribeirão Preto before their 2014 World Cup match with Honduras.[195] Deschamps wasn't as amused as some of his players were by the incident, though he was content to leave the investigation to FIFA.[195]

France[edit]

In October 2014 an Israeli tourist was arrested in front of Notre Dame de Paris and spent the night in jail.[196] The following morning he was fined 400 Euro for“operating an aircraft non-compliant with safety laws”.[196] He said he wasn't aware that it was illegal to fly drones in Paris and that he'd photographed Notre Dame, Hôtel-Dieu de Paris and a police station as he wanted to photograph Parisian monuments for private purposes.[196]

Nuclear power plant overflights[edit]

In October and November 2014 unidentified civilian UAVs were seen flying near 13 nuclear power plants, including Le Blayais and Gravelines.[197] The Secretariat-General for National Defence and Security issued a statement that the flights were an "organized provocation".[197] Initial suspicion fell upon Greenpeace, who denied any involvement.[197]The organisation did however point out the power stations were vulnerable to aerial attack.[197] Overflights of nuclear power plants are illegal in France, with a punishment of a year in prison and a fine of €75,000 if an aircraft comes within 5 km horizontally or 1 km vertically of a plant.[197]
In November 2014 two men and a woman were arrested near the Belleville Nuclear Power Plant with two UAVs.[198] French media reported that they didn't seem to have any connection with the unidentified flights.[198]

India[edit]

On 11 May 2014 Francescos' Pizza of Mumbai made a test delivery from a branch in Lower Parel to the roof of a building in Worli.[199] Police in Mumbai began an investigation on the grounds that security clearances had not been sought.[200]

Republic of Ireland[edit]

In 2012, Loitering Theatre group flew Parrot AR.Drones near Áras an Uachtaráin, the Magazine Fort, a prison facility and offices of Google on Barrow Street and also Facebook.[201] Footage filmed by the group was shown at an exhibit run by the Dublin Science Gallery.[201] The Irish Aviation Authority stated that this was prohibited as Dublin city is classed as a restricted area.[202]
A separate group, called Tomorrows Thoughts Today, who had attended the same event were detained on their return to the UK at London Southend Airport under the Terrorism Act.[202][203] They were released after a couple of hours questioning.[203]
In April 2014, Raymond Fogarty put a video of Cork City from a UAV that received publicity.[204][205][206] He was criticised for flying the UAV without a licence by Steve Slade of SkyTec Ireland and by Paudie Barry of Baseline Surveys Ireland.[207] Mr. Barry described Mr. Fogartys' as having acted “recklessly and irresponsibly”.[207] Mr Fogarty said he hadn't been contacted by the Irish Aviation Authority, but acknowledged that he had been naive in not looking up the laws and that he had contacted the IAA to get a licence.[207]The IAA declined to comment on the case but stated that licences were required to operate UAVs.[207]

South Africa[edit]

In June 2013, police officers apprehended a man who flew a multicopter outside the hospital that Nelson Mandela was in.[208] The pilot of the craft was questioned for several hours by police then released.[209] His equipment and footage were confiscated.[209] The pilot apologised for his actions and said he did not intend to invade Nelson Mandelas' privacy.[209]

United Kingdom[edit]

In April 2014, Robert Knowles of Barrow-in-Furness was prosecuted by the Civil Aviation Authority and pleaded guilty of flying a small UAV within 50 m of the Walney Bridge and the BAE Systems submarine testing facility.[210][210] Knowles claimed that he had been flying in a field a mile and a half from the BAE Systems base but had lost radio contact with the craft, which flew on for more than three minutes after that.[210] He was fined £800 and ordered to pay legal costs of £3,500.[210] The CAA claimed that the case raised safety issues related to flying unmanned aircraft.[210]

United States[edit]

Private citizens and media organizations use UAVs for surveillance, recreation, or personal land assessment. Occupy Wall Street journalist Tim Pool uses what he calls anOccucopter for live feed coverage of Occupy movement events.[211] The "occucopter" is an inexpensive radio controlled quadcopter with cameras attached and controllable byAndroid devices or iOS. In February 2012, an animal rights group used a MikroKopter hexacopter to film hunters shooting pigeons in South Carolina. The hunters then shot the UAV down.[212] UAVs also have been shown to have many other civilian uses, such as agriculture, Hollywood, and in the construction industry.[213] Falkor Systems, a pioneer in the consumer use of UAV technology, has targeted extreme sports photography and video for drone use, focusing on skiing and base-jumping activities.[214] On 24 July 2014, a drone was used in search & rescue operations to successfully located an elderly gentleman with dementia who went missing for 3 days.[215] In March 2015, the SXSW music festival in Austin, Texas banned drones, citing Wi-Fi bandwidth congestion and safety concerns. [216][217]

Virginia Bull Run crash[edit]

In August 2013, a UAV filming events at the Virginia Bull Run in Dinwiddie County, Virginia crashed into the crowd, causing minor injuries.[218][219]

New York drone conference[edit]

In October 2013, the Drones and Aerial Robotics Conference was held at New York University.[220][221] The attendees included Missy Cummings, Daniel Suarez, Christopher Kippenberger, Vijay Kumar as well as many hobbyists and academics.[220] A protest by Granny Peace Brigade against military and police use of drones was held outside.[220]

St Louis building collision[edit]

In early May 2014, a damaged DJI Phantom II quadrotor was discovered on a 30th floor balcony of One Metropolitan Square in St. Louis, Missouri.[222][223][224][225]

Staples Center incident[edit]

Fans of the Los Angeles Kings were celebrating a victory over the New York Rangers outside the Staples Center on Friday 13 2014 when a UAV was seen flying over the crowd.[226][227][228] The crowd began throwing objects at the UAV, bringing it close enough to the ground for members of the crowd to grab it and it was seriously damaged with a skateboard.[226][227] A video of the incident was posted online, which was widely viewed.[228] Claims that the UAV belonged to the Los Angeles Police Department were reported in the media, but the LAPD denied this and said they were treating the craft as lost property.[226][227] One journalist remarked that the craft resembled a DJI Phantom rather than the two Draganflyer X6 craft bought by the LAPD a couple of weeks before the incident.[228]

Venezuela[edit]

In June 2012, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez claimed that Venezuela had begun producing its own UAV. General Julio Morales added that the UAV had a range of 100 kilometres (about 60 miles), a maximum altitude of 3,000 metres (about 10,000 feet), could fly for 90 minutes, measured three by four metres, and was a part of a system to survey and monitor pipelines, dams, and other rural infrastructure. General Morales was the president of the state-run Cavim arms manufacturer that developed the aircraft.[229][230]

Vietnam[edit]

In May 2013, The Vietnam Space Technology Institute successfully conducted 37 UAV flights in the central Lam Dong province. Research for the UAVs began in 2008 and was later funded by the state in 2011.[231]

UAVs in the U.S. military[edit]

Main article: UAVs in the U.S. military
As of January 2014, the U.S. military operates a large number of unmanned aerial systems: 7,362 RQ-11 Ravens; 990 AeroVironment Wasp IIIs; 1,137 AeroVironment RQ-20 Pumas; and 306 RQ-16 T-Hawk small UAS systems and 246 Predators and MQ-1C Grey Eagles; 126 MQ-9 Reapers; 491 RQ-7 Shadows; and 33 RQ-4 Global Hawk large systems.[232]

Morality (military use)[edit]

The “unmanned” aspect of UAVs is primarily what sets them apart from manned aircraft. This aspect also raises certain moral concerns. Some believe that the asymmetry of fighting humans with machines that are controlled from a safe distance lacks integrity and honor that was once valued during warfare. Others feel that if such technology is available, then there is a moral duty to employ it in order to save as many lives as possible.[233] Another potential moral issue with UAVs is that because they do not allow for pilot casualties, some fear that they will be used more frivolously, and that human lives affected by UAV-based strikes will not be regarded with as much consideration as with manned aerial attacks.

Technology[edit]

See also: Revolution in Military Affairs
The use of drones can be understood as a manifestation and extension of the technological revolution in military affairs (RMA) discourse. The American military influenced the development of technology as it became more prevalent following the Second World War.[234] These new types of technologies create new ways in which soldiers are conceptualized. Traditionally, soldiers were considered to be physical combatants, whereas now, technology in warfare blurs the distinction between autonomous users and who is representative of a soldier.[235][dubious – discuss]

UAVs in popular culture[edit]

Main article: List of films featuring drones
Posted by at No comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)